Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Jayden Meghoma removeStavro Pilo remove
Age2025
PositionLeft-backLeft-back
Club · leagueRangers FC · Scottish PremiershipAthlitiki Enosi Konstantinoupoleos · Super League 1
League strength0.310.42
Team strength (Elo)14271512
League minutes2040 (69%)1242 (53%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.220.14
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.120.11
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile6861
Market value€2.0M€2.0M
Estimated acquisition€1.5M – €5.0M€763k – €2.2M
Model value€5.1M – €20.9M€1.1M – €5.3M
Projected value (24m)€1.6M – €6.7M€914k – €4.1M
Bargain Index86/10098/100
DevelopmentVery HighModerate
Breakout probability47%n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€1.5M – €5.0M
Model value (performance-implied)€5.1M – €20.9M
Projected value (24 months)€1.6M – €6.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€2.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€763k – €2.2M
Model value (performance-implied)€1.1M – €5.3M
Projected value (24 months)€914k – €4.1M
Dashed line: current market value (€2.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Jayden Meghoma and Stavro Pilo

  • Meghoma is 6 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Meghoma was used far more by the club (69% of minutes vs 53%).
  • Pilo is estimated to cost far less (€1.0M vs €2.9M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Pilo (Bargain Index 98 vs 86) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.