Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Janderson remove | Jackson Muleka remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 27 | 26 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | Göztepe · Super Lig | Konyaspor · Super Lig |
| League strength | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1281 | 1230 |
| League minutes | 2478 (81%) | 2231 (73%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.36 | 0.40 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.47 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 12 | 18 |
| Market value | €6.0M | €2.8M |
| Estimated acquisition | €2.9M – €7.2M | €833k – €2.1M |
| Model value | €380k – €1.5M | €468k – €1.1M |
| Projected value (24m) | €3.0M – €7.5M | €1.2M – €3.1M |
| Bargain Index | 31/100 | 77/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€2.9M – €7.2M Model value (performance-implied)€380k – €1.5M Projected value (24 months)€3.0M – €7.5M Dashed line: current market value (€6.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€833k – €2.1M Model value (performance-implied)€468k – €1.1M Projected value (24 months)€1.2M – €3.1M Dashed line: current market value (€2.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Janderson and Jackson Muleka
- Muleka has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.47 vs 0.39 per 90).
- Muleka is estimated to cost far less (€1.1M vs €5.5M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Muleka (Bargain Index 77 vs 31) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.