Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Mats Rots remove | Oliver Braude remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 20 | 22 |
| Position | Left-back | Right-back |
| Club · league | FC Twente Enschede · Eredivisie | SC Heerenveen · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1403 | 1284 |
| League minutes | 2955 (97%) | 2820 (92%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.24 | 0.16 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 41 | 30 |
| Market value | €12.0M | €5.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €9.7M – €19.7M | €1.8M – €4.8M |
| Model value | €619k – €4.2M | €468k – €1.9M |
| Projected value (24m) | €8.7M – €26.8M | €3.1M – €9.5M |
| Bargain Index | 52/100 | 100/100 |
| Development | Very High | High |
| Breakout probability | 44% | 27% |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€9.7M – €19.7M Model value (performance-implied)€619k – €4.2M Projected value (24 months)€8.7M – €26.8M Dashed line: current market value (€12.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.8M – €4.8M Model value (performance-implied)€468k – €1.9M Projected value (24 months)€3.1M – €9.5M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Mats Rots and Oliver Braude
- Rots is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Braude is estimated to cost far less (€2.3M vs €14.8M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Braude (Bargain Index 100 vs 52) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.