Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Pylyp Budkivskyi remove | Metehan Mimaroğlu remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 34 | 31 |
| Position | Striker | Left winger |
| Club · league | Zorya Lugansk · Premier Liga | Gençlerbirliği Spor Kulübü · Super Lig |
| League strength | 0.25 | 0.40 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1192 | 1161 |
| League minutes | 2358 (87%) | 1974 (65%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.53 | 0.46 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.57 | 0.61 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 42 | 11 |
| Market value | €300k | €400k |
| Estimated acquisition | €126k – €305k | €89k – €286k |
| Model value | €379k – €679k | €339k – €640k |
| Projected value (24m) | €49k – €285k | €193k – €369k |
| Bargain Index | No index | 84/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Very High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€126k – €305k Model value (performance-implied)€379k – €679k Projected value (24 months)€49k – €285k Dashed line: current market value (€300k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€89k – €286k Model value (performance-implied)€339k – €640k Projected value (24 months)€193k – €369k Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Pylyp Budkivskyi and Metehan Mimaroğlu
- Mimaroğlu is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Mimaroğlu plays in a stronger league (0.40 vs 0.25); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
- Budkivskyi was used far more by the club (87% of minutes vs 65%).
- Risk differs: Budkivskyi Very High, Mimaroğlu High.