Transfer Finder

“Find me a cheaper version of this player.” Nearest statistical profiles in the same position group with a lower estimated acquisition cost.

Target: Pape Matar Sarr · 23 · Central midfielder · Tottenham Hotspur · est. acquisition €21.5M – €40.1M

Similarity uses age, context-adjusted output, minutes share, performance percentile, league and team strength. Style/role similarity needs event data that the current free source lacks.

PlayerSimilarityAgePosMarket valueEst. acquisitionModel valueBIRiskStrengthsDifferences
Tim Iroegbunam
Everton FC · Premier League
46%23CM€18.0M€9.3M – €21.1M€11.5M – €30.3M86/100Risk: ModeratePerformance-implied value in the top 16% of MID peers; Improving trajectoryadj. G+A/90 0.21 vs 0.35
Diego Gómez
Brighton & Hove Albion · Premier League
40%23CM€25.0M€19.1M – €34.6M€14.9M – €38.9M53/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 10% of MID peers; Improving trajectory63% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.24 vs 0.35
Lewis Miley
Newcastle United · Premier League
40%20CM€25.0M€19.2M – €36.7M€22.1M – €43.6M81/100Risk: ModeratePerformance-implied value in the top 11% of MID peers; Strong for age (20): top 2% of same-age peers4 yrs younger; adj. G+A/90 0.23 vs 0.35
Maxence Caqueret
Como 1907 · Serie A
38%26CM€13.0M€7.0M – €14.6M€7.3M – €27.9M19/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 19% of MID peers; Goal contributions 1.4x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted)3 yrs older; weaker league (0.93)
Ao Tanaka
Leeds United · Premier League
38%27CM€13.0M€6.5M – €14.2M€5.2M – €16.0M21/100Risk: ModeratePerformance-implied value in the top 21% of MID peers4 yrs older; adj. G+A/90 0.22 vs 0.35
Sean Longstaff
Leeds United · Premier League
37%28CM€15.0M€6.1M – €15.5M€11.3M – €16.8M13/100Risk: ModeratePerformance-implied value in the top 13% of MID peers; Goal contributions 1.8x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted)5 yrs older
Jack Hinshelwood
Brighton & Hove Albion · Premier League
37%21AM€28.0M€17.5M – €39.5M€36.1M – €50.9M67/100Risk: ModeratePerformance-implied value in the top 6% of MID peers; Strong for age (21): top 2% of same-age peersplays Attacking midfielder; 3 yrs younger; adj. G+A/90 0.43 vs 0.35
Conor Gallagher
Tottenham Hotspur · Premier League
37%26CM€32.0M€17.3M – €36.0M€16.3M – €40.2M17/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 8% of MID peers3 yrs older; adj. G+A/90 0.18 vs 0.35
Joe Willock
Newcastle United · Premier League
37%26CM€14.0M€4.9M – €12.4M€16.1M – €25.6M85/100Risk: ModeratePerformance-implied value in the top 11% of MID peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value3 yrs older; adj. G+A/90 0.19 vs 0.35
Samuele Ricci
AC Milan · Serie A
37%24CM€22.0M€14.0M – €26.9M€6.7M – €28.6M36/100Risk: ModeratePerformance-implied value in the top 21% of MID peersweaker league (0.93); adj. G+A/90 0.22 vs 0.35
Javi Guerra
Valencia CF · Laliga
36%23CM€25.0M€17.1M – €32.1M€12.3M – €42.6M45/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 18% of MID peers; Goal contributions 1.9x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted)weaker league (0.95); 61% of minutes
Emile Smith Rowe
Fulham FC · Premier League
36%25AM€20.0M€9.6M – €22.6M€19.6M – €34.9M50/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 8% of MID peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied valueplays Attacking midfielder; 2 yrs older; 56% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.25 vs 0.35
Mikkel Damsgaard
Brentford FC · Premier League
36%25AM€30.0M€13.6M – €34.2M€34.3M – €60.0M25/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 4% of MID peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied valueplays Attacking midfielder; 2 yrs older; 60% of minutes
Jean-Ricner Bellegarde
Wolverhampton Wanderers · Premier League
36%28CM€16.0M€7.7M – €16.8M€9.3M – €22.3M14/100Risk: ModeratePerformance-implied value in the top 17% of MID peers4 yrs older; adj. G+A/90 0.24 vs 0.35
Sergi Altimira
Real Betis Balompié · Laliga
35%24CM€20.0M€13.9M – €25.9M€6.3M – €19.1M41/100Risk: Moderate630 minutes in continental competitionweaker league (0.95); adj. G+A/90 0.20 vs 0.35

Compare with the closest alternative →