Transfer Finder

“Find me a cheaper version of this player.” Nearest statistical profiles in the same position group with a lower estimated acquisition cost.

Target: Rémy Cabella · 36 · Attacking midfielder · FC Nantes · est. acquisition €338k – €934k

Similarity uses age, context-adjusted output, minutes share, performance percentile, league and team strength. Style/role similarity needs event data that the current free source lacks.

PlayerSimilarityAgePosMarket valueEst. acquisitionModel valueBIRiskStrengthsDifferences
Denis Suárez
Deportivo Alavés · Laliga
31%32AM€1.0M€276k – €821k€1.6M – €3.1M91/100Risk: HighPerformance-implied value in the top 21% of MID peers; Improving trajectory4 yrs younger; adj. G+A/90 0.42 vs 0.51
Mathieu Maertens
Oud-Heverlee Leuven · Jupiler Pro League
22%31AM€600k€180k – €790k€420k – €973k18/100Risk: HighImproving trajectory5 yrs younger; weaker league (0.65)
Vito van Crooij
Sparta Rotterdam · Eredivisie
16%30AM€900k€194k – €646k€432k – €883k64/100Risk: Very HighEstimated acquisition well below performance-implied value6 yrs younger; weaker league (0.43); adj. G+A/90 0.26 vs 0.51
Efkan Bekiroğlu
Göztepe · Super Lig
16%30AM€1.0M€221k – €735k€277k – €663k63/100Risk: Very HighEstimated acquisition well below performance-implied value6 yrs younger; weaker league (0.40)
Owen Maës
RAAL La Louvière · Jupiler Pro League
16%27AM€500k€139k – €611k€378k – €952k73/100Risk: ModerateEstimated acquisition well below performance-implied value9 yrs younger; weaker league (0.65); 45% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.33 vs 0.51
Birger Verstraete
Oud-Heverlee Leuven · Jupiler Pro League
16%32DM€900k€253k – €758k€528k – €2.3M23/100Risk: Very HighEstimated acquisition well below performance-implied valueplays Defensive midfielder; 4 yrs younger; weaker league (0.65); 56% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.05 vs 0.51
Pieter Gerkens
Cercle Brugge · Jupiler Pro League
16%31CM€800k€192k – €683k€707k – €1.8M43/100Risk: ModerateUndisputed starter (89% of league minutes); Improving trajectoryplays Central midfielder; 5 yrs younger; weaker league (0.65); 89% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.25 vs 0.51
Marco Ilaimaharitra
Standard Liège · Jupiler Pro League
16%30DM€800k€210k – €689k€526k – €1.5M36/100Risk: ModerateImproving trajectory; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied valueplays Defensive midfielder; 5 yrs younger; weaker league (0.65); 74% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.16 vs 0.51
Gustavo Klismahn
CD Santa Clara · Liga Portugal
15%26AM€500k€153k – €388k€418k – €1.0M98/100Risk: Very HighEstimated acquisition well below performance-implied value10 yrs younger; weaker league (0.58); adj. G+A/90 0.36 vs 0.51
Lukas Lerager
FC Copenhagen · Superliga
15%32CM€800k€235k – €864k€388k – €1.7M22/100Risk: HighImproving trajectory; 988 minutes in continental competitionplays Central midfielder; 3 yrs younger; weaker league (0.47); 60% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.12 vs 0.51
Maksim Kuzmin
Akron Togliatti · Premier Liga
15%30AM€800k€207k – €692k€381k – €733k58/100Risk: Very High—6 yrs younger; weaker league (0.56); adj. G+A/90 0.29 vs 0.51
Fousseni Diabaté
Kasimpasa · Super Lig
15%30AM€800k€176k – €557k€417k – €1.0M70/100Risk: HighEstimated acquisition well below performance-implied value6 yrs younger; weaker league (0.40); 65% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.30 vs 0.51
João Mendes
Kayserispor · Super Lig
15%31AM€1.0M€221k – €704k€359k – €910k42/100Risk: HighEstimated acquisition well below performance-implied value5 yrs younger; weaker league (0.40); 49% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.32 vs 0.51
Stefan Loncar
Akron Togliatti · Premier Liga
15%30CM€1.2M€268k – €849k€667k – €1.2M47/100Risk: Very HighGoal contributions 1.6x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted); Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied valueplays Central midfielder; 6 yrs younger; weaker league (0.56); 67% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.34 vs 0.51
Dmitriy Rybchinskiy
FC Orenburg · Premier Liga
15%27AM€700k€171k – €484k€456k – €767k90/100Risk: HighEstimated acquisition well below performance-implied value8 yrs younger; weaker league (0.56); 43% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.34 vs 0.51

Compare with the closest alternative →