Transfer Finder

“Find me a cheaper version of this player.” Nearest statistical profiles in the same position group with a lower estimated acquisition cost.

Target: Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall · 27 · Attacking midfielder · Everton FC · est. acquisition €15.8M – €40.3M

Similarity uses age, context-adjusted output, minutes share, performance percentile, league and team strength. Style/role similarity needs event data that the current free source lacks.

PlayerSimilarityAgePosMarket valueEst. acquisitionModel valueBIRiskStrengthsDifferences
Brenden Aaronson
Leeds United · Premier League
55%25AM€22.0M€9.9M – €23.3M€8.4M – €31.9M94/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 15% of MID peers2 yrs younger
Marcus Tavernier
AFC Bournemouth · Premier League
51%27AM€25.0M€11.9M – €28.1M€24.7M – €51.4M66/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 3% of MID peers; Undisputed starter (80% of league minutes)adj. G+A/90 0.41 vs 0.51
Enzo Le Fée
Sunderland AFC · Premier League
43%26LM€28.0M€20.0M – €34.3M€13.6M – €37.7M23/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 12% of MID peers; Goal contributions 2.1x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted)plays Left midfielder
Anton Stach
Leeds United · Premier League
39%27CM€28.0M€17.1M – €33.7M€10.1M – €31.4M26/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 12% of MID peers; Goal contributions 1.8x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted)plays Central midfielder; adj. G+A/90 0.39 vs 0.51
Mikkel Damsgaard
Brentford FC · Premier League
38%25AM€30.0M€13.6M – €34.2M€34.3M – €60.0M25/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 4% of MID peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value60% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.36 vs 0.51
Alexis Claude-Maurice
FC Augsburg · Bundesliga
36%28AM€15.0M€5.1M – €13.2M€4.1M – €11.8M57/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 24% of MID peersweaker league (0.94)
Lucas Paquetá
West Ham United · Premier League
35%28AM€32.0M€12.2M – €33.2M€13.0M – €28.0M7/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 11% of MID peers45% of minutes
Nadiem Amiri
1.FSV Mainz 05 · Bundesliga
32%29CM€17.0M€7.0M – €16.6M€10.5M – €48.2M16/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 9% of MID peers; Goal contributions 2.0x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted)plays Central midfielder; weaker league (0.94)
Fabian Rieder
FC Augsburg · Bundesliga
32%24AM€12.0M€7.9M – €17.6M€4.1M – €12.3M54/100Risk: LowUndisputed starter (81% of league minutes); Improving trajectory3 yrs younger; weaker league (0.94)
Federico Dimarco
Inter Milan · Serie A
31%28LM€50.0M€17.7M – €40.7M€45.8M – €66.1M62/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 1% of MID peers; Goal contributions 2.2x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted)plays Left midfielder; weaker league (0.93)
Brais Méndez
Real Sociedad · Laliga
31%29AM€8.0M€3.7M – €9.2M€3.0M – €7.5M11/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 24% of MID peers; Goal contributions 1.3x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted)weaker league (0.95); 49% of minutes
Pavel Sulc
Olympique Lyon · Ligue 1
31%25AM€20.0M€13.4M – €26.9M€5.8M – €29.0M46/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 20% of MID peers; 657 minutes in continental competition2 yrs younger; weaker league (0.88); 51% of minutes
Romano Schmid
SV Werder Bremen · Bundesliga
31%26AM€15.0M€5.5M – €13.0M€5.6M – €26.5M89/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 18% of MID peers; Undisputed starter (98% of league minutes)weaker league (0.94); 98% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.40 vs 0.51
Pablo Fornals
Real Betis Balompié · Laliga
30%30CM€8.0M€3.5M – €8.2M€11.2M – €27.8M37/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 5% of MID peers; Goal contributions 1.7x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted)plays Central midfielder; 3 yrs older; weaker league (0.95); adj. G+A/90 0.37 vs 0.51
Emile Smith Rowe
Fulham FC · Premier League
30%25AM€20.0M€9.6M – €22.6M€19.6M – €34.9M50/100Risk: LowPerformance-implied value in the top 8% of MID peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value56% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.25 vs 0.51

Compare with the closest alternative →