Transfer Finder
“Find me a cheaper version of this player.” Nearest statistical profiles in the same position group with a lower estimated acquisition cost.
Target: Romain Faivre · 27 · Right midfielder · AJ Auxerre · est. acquisition €1.2M – €3.2M
Similarity uses age, context-adjusted output, minutes share, performance percentile, league and team strength. Style/role similarity needs event data that the current free source lacks.
| Player | Similarity | Age | Pos | Market value | Est. acquisition | Model value | BI | Risk | Strengths | Differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bakery Jatta Hamburger SV · Bundesliga | 56% | 28 | RM | €1.0M | €335k – €1.1M | €999k – €2.7M | 80/100 | Risk: Moderate | Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | very similar |
| Florian Neuhaus Borussia Mönchengladbach · Bundesliga | 41% | 29 | AM | €2.5M | €710k – €2.0M | €1.5M – €3.8M | 74/100 | Risk: Moderate | Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | plays Attacking midfielder |
| Marius Wolf FC Augsburg · Bundesliga | 39% | 31 | RM | €2.5M | €730k – €2.1M | €1.8M – €3.0M | 39/100 | Risk: High | Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | 3 yrs older |
| Nahuel Estévez Parma Calcio 1913 · Serie A | 36% | 30 | DM | €1.4M | €449k – €1.5M | €545k – €2.7M | 33/100 | Risk: High | Goal contributions 1.3x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted); Improving trajectory | plays Defensive midfielder; 3 yrs older; adj. G+A/90 0.16 vs 0.25 |
| Antonio Sánchez RCD Mallorca · Laliga | 36% | 29 | CM | €2.0M | €520k – €1.6M | €1.5M – €3.9M | 76/100 | Risk: Moderate | Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | plays Central midfielder; adj. G+A/90 0.13 vs 0.25 |
| Abdou Harroui Hellas Verona · Serie A | 35% | 28 | CM | €1.6M | €565k – €1.6M | €1.0M – €2.8M | 45/100 | Risk: Moderate | Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | plays Central midfielder |
| Alessio Zerbin US Cremonese · Serie A | 33% | 27 | RM | €2.0M | €773k – €2.1M | €1.0M – €2.8M | 60/100 | Risk: Low | Goal contributions 1.5x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted) | 48% of minutes |
| Kervin Arriaga Levante UD · Laliga | 33% | 28 | DM | €2.0M | €877k – €2.3M | €1.3M – €4.0M | 70/100 | Risk: Moderate | Goal contributions 2.4x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted) | plays Defensive midfielder; 45% of minutes |
| Cheikh Niasse Hellas Verona · Serie A | 33% | 26 | CM | €2.0M | €749k – €2.1M | €757k – €2.3M | 63/100 | Risk: Moderate | Improving trajectory | plays Central midfielder |
| Oriol Rey Levante UD · Laliga | 32% | 28 | DM | €1.8M | €571k – €1.6M | €1.1M – €3.3M | 84/100 | Risk: Moderate | Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | plays Defensive midfielder; 39% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.11 vs 0.25 |
| Lars Ritzka FC St. Pauli · Bundesliga | 32% | 28 | LM | €1.0M | €296k – €1.2M | €488k – €1.8M | 62/100 | Risk: Moderate | Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | plays Left midfielder; adj. G+A/90 0.15 vs 0.25 |
| Manolis Saliakas FC St. Pauli · Bundesliga | 31% | 29 | RM | €2.0M | €556k – €2.2M | €996k – €3.9M | 35/100 | Risk: Moderate | Goal contributions 2.0x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted); Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | 36% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.43 vs 0.25 |
| Youssef Maleh US Cremonese · Serie A | 31% | 27 | CM | €1.5M | €414k – €1.3M | €1.4M – €4.3M | 86/100 | Risk: Moderate | Improving trajectory; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | plays Central midfielder; 46% of minutes |
| Alessandro Deiola Cagliari Calcio · Serie A | 31% | 30 | CM | €1.5M | €464k – €1.5M | €979k – €3.7M | 68/100 | Risk: Moderate | Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | plays Central midfielder; 3 yrs older; 42% of minutes |
| Jon Guridi Deportivo Alavés · Laliga | 30% | 31 | CM | €1.8M | €552k – €1.7M | €1.2M – €2.4M | 30/100 | Risk: High | — | plays Central midfielder; 3 yrs older; 36% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.12 vs 0.25 |