Transfer Finder
“Find me a cheaper version of this player.” Nearest statistical profiles in the same position group with a lower estimated acquisition cost.
Target: Lennart Karl · 18 · Right winger · Bayern Munich · est. acquisition €46.2M – €96.2M
Similarity uses age, context-adjusted output, minutes share, performance percentile, league and team strength. Style/role similarity needs event data that the current free source lacks.
| Player | Similarity | Age | Pos | Market value | Est. acquisition | Model value | BI | Risk | Strengths | Differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ibrahim Mbaye Paris Saint-Germain · Ligue 1 | 48% | 18 | RW | €30.0M | €23.1M – €47.8M | €8.3M – €37.1M | 68/100 | Risk: Moderate | — | adj. G+A/90 0.17 vs 0.27 |
| Franco Mastantuono Real Madrid · Laliga | 41% | 18 | RW | €45.0M | €34.3M – €71.1M | €5.3M – €37.5M | 20/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 23% of ATT peers | adj. G+A/90 0.13 vs 0.27 |
| Pio Esposito Inter Milan · Serie A | 35% | 21 | ST | €45.0M | €35.5M – €65.5M | €10.7M – €52.9M | 21/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 15% of ATT peers; Strong for age (21): top 12% of same-age peers | plays Striker; 3 yrs older; adj. G+A/90 0.35 vs 0.27 |
| Assane Diao Como 1907 · Serie A | 32% | 20 | RW | €30.0M | €22.5M – €42.4M | €5.6M – €23.7M | 35/100 | Risk: Moderate | Strong for age (21): top 26% of same-age peers | 2 yrs older |
| Gianluca Prestianni SL Benfica · Liga Portugal | 32% | 20 | RW | €20.0M | €16.4M – €32.0M | €4.4M – €19.0M | 45/100 | Risk: Moderate | — | 2 yrs older; weaker league (0.58) |
| Gonzalo García Real Madrid · Laliga | 31% | 22 | ST | €30.0M | €23.0M – €42.9M | €7.3M – €16.0M | 19/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 22% of ATT peers; Strong for age (22): top 11% of same-age peers | plays Striker; 4 yrs older |
| Oscar Bobb Fulham FC · Premier League | 30% | 22 | RW | €28.0M | €20.9M – €38.6M | €8.3M – €23.9M | 12/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 20% of ATT peers; Strong for age (23): top 11% of same-age peers | 5 yrs older; stronger league (1.30) |
| Noni Madueke Arsenal FC · Premier League | 30% | 24 | RW | €50.0M | €32.6M – €74.2M | €29.6M – €61.1M | 12/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 6% of ATT peers; 572 minutes in continental competition | 6 yrs older; stronger league (1.30) |
| Samuel Amo-Ameyaw RC Strasbourg Alsace · Ligue 1 | 30% | 19 | RW | €8.0M | €6.5M – €18.1M | €5.5M – €34.4M | 55/100 | Risk: Moderate | Strong for age (20): top 19% of same-age peers | very similar |
| Christian Kofane Bayer 04 Leverkusen · Bundesliga | 29% | 19 | ST | €40.0M | €30.6M – €58.3M | €6.1M – €37.0M | 28/100 | Risk: Low | Strong for age (20): top 14% of same-age peers; 600 minutes in continental competition | plays Striker; adj. G+A/90 0.41 vs 0.27 |
| William Gomes FC Porto · Liga Portugal | 29% | 20 | RW | €25.0M | €19.7M – €37.9M | €2.6M – €13.3M | 27/100 | Risk: High | 626 minutes in continental competition | weaker league (0.58); adj. G+A/90 0.37 vs 0.27 |
| Francisco Conceição Juventus FC · Serie A | 29% | 23 | RW | €30.0M | €20.9M – €39.0M | €16.8M – €38.4M | 20/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 20% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | 5 yrs older; 61% of minutes |
| Giuliano Simeone Atlético de Madrid · Laliga | 29% | 23 | RW | €40.0M | €27.7M – €50.3M | €13.1M – €52.4M | 29/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 13% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | 5 yrs older; 62% of minutes |
| Bradley Barcola Paris Saint-Germain · Ligue 1 | 29% | 23 | LW | €70.0M | €50.7M – €92.9M | €44.8M – €82.1M | 17/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 2% of ATT peers; 1020 minutes in continental competition | plays Left winger; 5 yrs older; 57% of minutes |
| Endrick Olympique Lyon · Ligue 1 | 28% | 19 | RW | €40.0M | €29.0M – €56.9M | €6.1M – €31.6M | 22/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 21% of ATT peers; Strong for age (20): top 7% of same-age peers | adj. G+A/90 0.49 vs 0.27 |