Transfer Finder
“Find me a cheaper version of this player.” Nearest statistical profiles in the same position group with a lower estimated acquisition cost.
Target: Patrik Schick · 30 · Striker · Bayer 04 Leverkusen · est. acquisition €9.9M – €20.4M
Similarity uses age, context-adjusted output, minutes share, performance percentile, league and team strength. Style/role similarity needs event data that the current free source lacks.
| Player | Similarity | Age | Pos | Market value | Est. acquisition | Model value | BI | Risk | Strengths | Differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Sørloth Atlético de Madrid · Laliga | 49% | 30 | ST | €18.0M | €9.8M – €20.4M | €9.3M – €30.5M | 1/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 7% of ATT peers; 617 minutes in continental competition | adj. G+A/90 0.36 vs 0.48 |
| Breel Embolo Stade Rennais FC · Ligue 1 | 49% | 29 | ST | €15.0M | €9.3M – €17.6M | €5.1M – €14.5M | 1/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 19% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | very similar |
| Odsonne Édouard RC Lens · Ligue 1 | 47% | 28 | ST | €12.0M | €7.8M – €15.1M | €11.1M – €32.6M | 5/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 10% of ATT peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | very similar |
| Nicolas Pépé Villarreal CF · Laliga | 42% | 31 | RW | €6.0M | €2.3M – €6.5M | €10.9M – €20.4M | 5/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 8% of ATT peers; Goal contributions 1.4x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted) | plays Right winger |
| Gorka Guruzeta Athletic Bilbao · Laliga | 41% | 29 | ST | €5.0M | €2.4M – €6.0M | €6.2M – €10.5M | 9/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 18% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | very similar |
| Wesley Saïd RC Lens · Ligue 1 | 40% | 31 | SS | €5.0M | €1.9M – €6.1M | €4.2M – €8.8M | 2/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 22% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | plays Second striker |
| Riccardo Orsolini Bologna Football Club 1909 · Serie A | 40% | 29 | RW | €15.0M | €4.9M – €12.2M | €8.1M – €28.2M | 29/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 13% of ATT peers; 557 minutes in continental competition | plays Right winger |
| Chris Führich VfB Stuttgart · Bundesliga | 40% | 28 | LW | €12.0M | €4.9M – €12.5M | €10.4M – €24.9M | 15/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 15% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | plays Left winger |
| Isi Palazón Rayo Vallecano · Laliga | 38% | 31 | SS | €2.8M | €1.1M – €2.9M | €2.3M – €6.5M | 6/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 18% of ATT peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | plays Second striker |
| Jorge de Frutos Rayo Vallecano · Laliga | 38% | 29 | RW | €12.0M | €6.2M – €13.8M | €5.0M – €18.5M | 8/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 18% of ATT peers | plays Right winger |
| Hugo Duro Valencia CF · Laliga | 38% | 26 | ST | €12.0M | €7.5M – €15.0M | €8.7M – €29.3M | 19/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 18% of ATT peers | 4 yrs younger |
| Phillip Tietz 1.FSV Mainz 05 · Bundesliga | 37% | 28 | ST | €4.0M | €1.9M – €4.6M | €3.4M – €11.7M | 22/100 | Risk: Low | Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | very similar |
| Ché Adams Torino FC · Serie A | 37% | 29 | ST | €5.0M | €1.7M – €5.2M | €7.7M – €16.2M | 32/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 19% of ATT peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | very similar |
| Aleksandr Golovin AS Monaco · Ligue 1 | 36% | 30 | LW | €18.0M | €8.5M – €17.2M | €5.8M – €9.3M | 1/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 25% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | plays Left winger |
| Lucas Höler SC Freiburg · Bundesliga | 35% | 31 | SS | €3.0M | €1.0M – €3.5M | €2.7M – €7.4M | 4/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 18% of ATT peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | plays Second striker; adj. G+A/90 0.35 vs 0.48 |