Transfer Finder
“Find me a cheaper version of this player.” Nearest statistical profiles in the same position group with a lower estimated acquisition cost.
Target: Deniz Undav · 29 · Striker · VfB Stuttgart · est. acquisition €13.4M – €25.2M
Similarity uses age, context-adjusted output, minutes share, performance percentile, league and team strength. Style/role similarity needs event data that the current free source lacks.
| Player | Similarity | Age | Pos | Market value | Est. acquisition | Model value | BI | Risk | Strengths | Differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giovanni Simeone Torino FC · Serie A | 41% | 30 | ST | €7.0M | €3.3M – €8.6M | €3.8M – €7.3M | 2/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 19% of ATT peers | adj. G+A/90 0.61 vs 0.69 |
| Toni Martínez Deportivo Alavés · Laliga | 40% | 29 | ST | €7.5M | €4.3M – €9.7M | €4.9M – €16.2M | 24/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 24% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | adj. G+A/90 0.61 vs 0.69 |
| Andrea Pinamonti US Sassuolo · Serie A | 38% | 27 | ST | €15.0M | €6.4M – €15.2M | €8.0M – €26.6M | 71/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 21% of ATT peers | 3 yrs younger |
| Keinan Davis Udinese Calcio · Serie A | 38% | 28 | ST | €10.0M | €6.1M – €13.3M | €5.7M – €11.2M | 15/100 | Risk: Low | Goal contributions 1.5x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted); Improving trajectory | very similar |
| Vedat Muriqi RCD Mallorca · Laliga | 38% | 32 | ST | €4.5M | €1.9M – €5.2M | €4.6M – €9.5M | 10/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 13% of ATT peers; Goal contributions 1.4x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted) | 2 yrs older; 92% of minutes |
| Nicolas Pépé Villarreal CF · Laliga | 37% | 31 | RW | €6.0M | €2.3M – €6.5M | €10.9M – €20.4M | 5/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 8% of ATT peers; Goal contributions 1.4x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted) | plays Right winger; adj. G+A/90 0.55 vs 0.69 |
| Richarlison Tottenham Hotspur · Premier League | 37% | 29 | ST | €25.0M | €10.3M – €27.1M | €12.4M – €45.3M | 25/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 6% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | stronger league (1.30); 57% of minutes |
| Patrik Schick Bayer 04 Leverkusen · Bundesliga | 36% | 30 | ST | €18.0M | €9.9M – €20.4M | €14.3M – €35.2M | 1/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 5% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | adj. G+A/90 0.48 vs 0.69 |
| Odsonne Édouard RC Lens · Ligue 1 | 36% | 28 | ST | €12.0M | €7.8M – €15.1M | €11.1M – €32.6M | 5/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 10% of ATT peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | 53% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.53 vs 0.69 |
| Lucas Boyé Deportivo Alavés · Laliga | 35% | 30 | ST | €5.0M | €2.4M – €6.3M | €1.8M – €9.5M | 2/100 | Risk: Low | — | 57% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.60 vs 0.69 |
| Haris Tabakovic Borussia Mönchengladbach · Bundesliga | 35% | 32 | ST | €3.5M | €1.7M – €4.1M | €1.7M – €3.5M | 6/100 | Risk: Moderate | Improving trajectory | 2 yrs older; adj. G+A/90 0.58 vs 0.69 |
| Breel Embolo Stade Rennais FC · Ligue 1 | 35% | 29 | ST | €15.0M | €9.3M – €17.6M | €5.1M – €14.5M | 1/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 19% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | adj. G+A/90 0.48 vs 0.69 |
| Wesley Saïd RC Lens · Ligue 1 | 34% | 31 | SS | €5.0M | €1.9M – €6.1M | €4.2M – €8.8M | 2/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 22% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | plays Second striker; adj. G+A/90 0.54 vs 0.69 |
| Nicolò Zaniolo Udinese Calcio · Serie A | 33% | 27 | SS | €15.0M | €10.4M – €16.8M | €7.2M – €19.3M | 17/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 20% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | plays Second striker; 3 yrs younger |
| Ché Adams Torino FC · Serie A | 33% | 29 | ST | €5.0M | €1.7M – €5.2M | €7.7M – €16.2M | 32/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 19% of ATT peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | 56% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.52 vs 0.69 |