Transfer Finder
“Find me a cheaper version of this player.” Nearest statistical profiles in the same position group with a lower estimated acquisition cost.
Target: Stije Resink · 23 · Defensive midfielder · FC Groningen · est. acquisition €3.7M – €8.9M
Similarity uses age, context-adjusted output, minutes share, performance percentile, league and team strength. Style/role similarity needs event data that the current free source lacks.
| Player | Similarity | Age | Pos | Market value | Est. acquisition | Model value | BI | Risk | Strengths | Differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novatus Miroshi Göztepe · Super Lig | 51% | 23 | DM | €5.0M | €2.2M – €7.3M | €669k – €1.2M | 71/100 | Risk: Moderate | Goal contributions 1.6x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted); Improving trajectory | adj. G+A/90 0.20 vs 0.31 |
| Josh Mulligan Hibernian FC · Scottish Premiership | 45% | 23 | DM | €3.0M | €1.3M – €4.2M | €770k – €2.5M | 54/100 | Risk: Moderate | Goal contributions 1.6x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted); 585 minutes in continental competition | adj. G+A/90 0.19 vs 0.31 |
| Shunsuke Mito Sparta Rotterdam · Eredivisie | 44% | 23 | LM | €2.0M | €854k – €2.9M | €465k – €983k | 66/100 | Risk: High | Improving trajectory | plays Left midfielder |
| Lukasz Lakomy Oud-Heverlee Leuven · Jupiler Pro League | 43% | 25 | DM | €2.0M | €810k – €2.5M | €508k – €2.2M | 64/100 | Risk: Moderate | Goal contributions 2.5x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted) | 2 yrs older; stronger league (0.65) |
| Ringo Meerveld SC Heerenveen · Eredivisie | 43% | 23 | AM | €5.0M | €2.1M – €6.2M | €645k – €1.5M | 77/100 | Risk: Moderate | — | plays Attacking midfielder |
| Yan Kostenko Karpaty Lviv · Premier Liga | 43% | 22 | LM | €800k | €354k – €963k | €503k – €1.4M | 85/100 | Risk: High | Improving trajectory | plays Left midfielder; weaker league (0.25) |
| Dejan Popara Zorya Lugansk · Premier Liga | 42% | 23 | DM | €800k | €374k – €937k | €462k – €972k | 77/100 | Risk: High | Goal contributions 1.4x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted); Improving trajectory | weaker league (0.25); adj. G+A/90 0.17 vs 0.31 |
| Andreas Ntoi Rio Ave FC · Liga Portugal | 41% | 23 | DM | €5.0M | €2.2M – €5.8M | €762k – €1.8M | 58/100 | Risk: Moderate | Improving trajectory | adj. G+A/90 0.15 vs 0.31 |
| Anthony Dennis Göztepe · Super Lig | 41% | 22 | DM | €8.0M | €3.5M – €8.1M | €560k – €1.9M | 96/100 | Risk: High | Undisputed starter (81% of league minutes); Improving trajectory | adj. G+A/90 0.15 vs 0.31 |
| Andreas Pyndt FC Fredericia · Superliga | 41% | 25 | DM | €600k | €150k – €576k | €339k – €657k | 98/100 | Risk: High | Goal contributions 1.7x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted); Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | 2 yrs older; adj. G+A/90 0.21 vs 0.31 |
| Dmitriy Vasiljev FK Sochi · Premier Liga | 41% | 22 | DM | €900k | €439k – €1.2M | €577k – €2.5M | 82/100 | Risk: Very High | Goal contributions 1.6x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted) | 52% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.20 vs 0.31 |
| Sergey Babkin PFK Krylya Sovetov Samara · Premier Liga | 40% | 23 | CM | €2.0M | €908k – €2.4M | €816k – €1.5M | 66/100 | Risk: High | Improving trajectory | plays Central midfielder; adj. G+A/90 0.21 vs 0.31 |
| Elliot Watt Motherwell FC · Scottish Premiership | 40% | 26 | DM | €2.0M | €504k – €1.7M | €416k – €1.5M | 94/100 | Risk: High | Goal contributions 2.0x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted); Undisputed starter (83% of league minutes) | 3 yrs older |
| Tika de Jonge FC Groningen · Eredivisie | 40% | 23 | CM | €1.8M | €922k – €3.0M | €354k – €1.0M | 68/100 | Risk: Moderate | Improving trajectory | plays Central midfielder; adj. G+A/90 0.19 vs 0.31 |
| Rafael Brito Casa Pia AC · Liga Portugal | 40% | 24 | DM | €600k | €230k – €726k | €427k – €1.2M | 87/100 | Risk: Moderate | Goal contributions 1.8x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted); Improving trajectory | 50% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.22 vs 0.31 |