Transfer Finder
“Find me a cheaper version of this player.” Nearest statistical profiles in the same position group with a lower estimated acquisition cost.
Target: Charles De Ketelaere · 25 · Attacking midfielder · Atalanta BC · est. acquisition €17.6M – €36.5M
Similarity uses age, context-adjusted output, minutes share, performance percentile, league and team strength. Style/role similarity needs event data that the current free source lacks.
| Player | Similarity | Age | Pos | Market value | Est. acquisition | Model value | BI | Risk | Strengths | Differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Nebel 1.FSV Mainz 05 · Bundesliga | 49% | 23 | AM | €18.0M | €7.3M – €16.9M | €8.0M – €29.7M | 95/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 21% of MID peers | very similar |
| Eljif Elmas SSC Napoli · Serie A | 49% | 26 | AM | €13.0M | €6.1M – €14.1M | €7.4M – €21.1M | 24/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 20% of MID peers | very similar |
| Nicola Zalewski Atalanta BC · Serie A | 46% | 24 | LM | €20.0M | €15.9M – €26.7M | €12.4M – €24.5M | 42/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 18% of MID peers; Improving trajectory | plays Left midfielder |
| Oihan Sancet Athletic Bilbao · Laliga | 46% | 26 | AM | €25.0M | €12.7M – €27.4M | €5.6M – €23.7M | 23/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 19% of MID peers | very similar |
| Aimar Oroz CA Osasuna · Laliga | 44% | 24 | AM | €7.5M | €3.7M – €9.7M | €6.0M – €23.4M | 47/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 24% of MID peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | very similar |
| Hákon Arnar Haraldsson LOSC Lille · Ligue 1 | 44% | 23 | AM | €25.0M | €17.7M – €32.4M | €11.9M – €28.6M | 55/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 19% of MID peers; Undisputed starter (81% of league minutes) | 2 yrs younger; 81% of minutes |
| Julio Enciso RC Strasbourg Alsace · Ligue 1 | 43% | 22 | AM | €25.0M | €17.2M – €32.3M | €11.5M – €37.3M | 49/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 18% of MID peers; Strong for age (22): top 18% of same-age peers | 3 yrs younger; adj. G+A/90 0.38 vs 0.28 |
| Emile Smith Rowe Fulham FC · Premier League | 42% | 25 | AM | €20.0M | €9.6M – €22.6M | €19.6M – €34.9M | 50/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 8% of MID peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | stronger league (1.30) |
| Lucas Da Cunha Como 1907 · Serie A | 41% | 25 | CM | €20.0M | €14.5M – €27.7M | €11.7M – €30.2M | 63/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 15% of MID peers; Goal contributions 1.3x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted) | plays Central midfielder; 80% of minutes |
| Mikkel Damsgaard Brentford FC · Premier League | 40% | 25 | AM | €30.0M | €13.6M – €34.2M | €34.3M – €60.0M | 25/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 4% of MID peers; Estimated acquisition well below performance-implied value | stronger league (1.30) |
| Angel Gomes Olympique Marseille · Ligue 1 | 39% | 25 | AM | €10.0M | €4.8M – €10.7M | €6.4M – €14.8M | 26/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 22% of MID peers; Improving trajectory | 40% of minutes |
| Georgiy Sudakov SL Benfica · Liga Portugal | 39% | 23 | AM | €25.0M | €15.8M – €28.4M | €1.7M – €13.3M | 48/100 | Risk: Moderate | 1145 minutes in continental competition | weaker league (0.58) |
| Pavel Sulc Olympique Lyon · Ligue 1 | 38% | 25 | AM | €20.0M | €13.4M – €26.9M | €5.8M – €29.0M | 46/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 20% of MID peers; 657 minutes in continental competition | adj. G+A/90 0.47 vs 0.28 |
| Jens Odgaard Bologna Football Club 1909 · Serie A | 37% | 27 | AM | €12.0M | €6.2M – €13.1M | €5.7M – €26.5M | 18/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 18% of MID peers | 40% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.38 vs 0.28 |
| Farès Chaïbi Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga | 37% | 23 | AM | €15.0M | €10.5M – €21.2M | €7.5M – €25.3M | 55/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 24% of MID peers; Improving trajectory | adj. G+A/90 0.43 vs 0.28 |