Transfer Finder
“Find me a cheaper version of this player.” Nearest statistical profiles in the same position group with a lower estimated acquisition cost.
Target: Abde Ezzalzouli · 24 · Left winger · Real Betis Balompié · est. acquisition €30.9M – €54.3M
Similarity uses age, context-adjusted output, minutes share, performance percentile, league and team strength. Style/role similarity needs event data that the current free source lacks.
| Player | Similarity | Age | Pos | Market value | Est. acquisition | Model value | BI | Risk | Strengths | Differences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georges Mikautadze Villarreal CF · Laliga | 54% | 25 | ST | €30.0M | €23.9M – €39.5M | €12.6M – €29.0M | 38/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 11% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | plays Striker |
| Martial Godo RC Strasbourg Alsace · Ligue 1 | 44% | 23 | LW | €22.0M | €17.1M – €32.6M | €4.9M – €26.5M | 22/100 | Risk: Moderate | Performance-implied value in the top 24% of ATT peers | adj. G+A/90 0.52 vs 0.60 |
| Joaquín Panichelli RC Strasbourg Alsace · Ligue 1 | 43% | 23 | ST | €35.0M | €27.8M – €49.7M | €5.0M – €26.4M | 13/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 22% of ATT peers | plays Striker |
| Anastasios Douvikas Como 1907 · Serie A | 42% | 26 | ST | €25.0M | €18.8M – €32.4M | €10.8M – €36.3M | 6/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 15% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | plays Striker; 2 yrs older |
| Igor Paixão Olympique Marseille · Ligue 1 | 40% | 26 | LW | €35.0M | €21.6M – €37.5M | €7.5M – €25.2M | 22/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 15% of ATT peers; 471 minutes in continental competition | adj. G+A/90 0.42 vs 0.60 |
| Nico Williams Athletic Bilbao · Laliga | 39% | 23 | LW | €40.0M | €27.9M – €47.3M | €8.9M – €35.2M | 18/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 21% of ATT peers | 49% of minutes; adj. G+A/90 0.47 vs 0.60 |
| Armand Laurienté US Sassuolo · Serie A | 39% | 27 | LW | €19.0M | €12.6M – €20.6M | €4.5M – €18.4M | 12/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 25% of ATT peers; Goal contributions 1.6x the positional average in the league (context-adjusted) | 3 yrs older |
| Fisnik Asllani TSG 1899 Hoffenheim · Bundesliga | 39% | 23 | SS | €35.0M | €27.6M – €49.5M | €4.8M – €27.2M | 31/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 22% of ATT peers | plays Second striker; adj. G+A/90 0.69 vs 0.60 |
| Nicolò Zaniolo Udinese Calcio · Serie A | 38% | 27 | SS | €15.0M | €10.4M – €16.8M | €7.2M – €19.3M | 17/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 20% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | plays Second striker; 2 yrs older |
| Chris Führich VfB Stuttgart · Bundesliga | 38% | 28 | LW | €12.0M | €4.9M – €12.5M | €10.4M – €24.9M | 15/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 15% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | 4 yrs older; adj. G+A/90 0.48 vs 0.60 |
| Jamie Leweling VfB Stuttgart · Bundesliga | 38% | 25 | LW | €40.0M | €31.1M – €54.2M | €11.6M – €36.5M | 26/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 16% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | adj. G+A/90 0.41 vs 0.60 |
| Crysencio Summerville West Ham United · Premier League | 38% | 24 | LW | €35.0M | €25.3M – €48.0M | €15.6M – €31.2M | 30/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 14% of ATT peers; Improving trajectory | stronger league (1.30); adj. G+A/90 0.46 vs 0.60 |
| Christos Tzolis Club Brugge KV · Jupiler Pro League | 37% | 24 | LW | €40.0M | €32.3M – €53.1M | €11.4M – €38.2M | 20/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 13% of ATT peers; Undisputed starter (80% of league minutes) | weaker league (0.65); adj. G+A/90 0.47 vs 0.60 |
| Vladyslav Vanat Girona FC · Laliga | 37% | 24 | ST | €15.0M | €11.3M – €20.6M | €5.2M – €20.8M | 11/100 | Risk: Low | — | plays Striker |
| Hugo Duro Valencia CF · Laliga | 37% | 26 | ST | €12.0M | €7.5M – €15.0M | €8.7M – €29.3M | 19/100 | Risk: Low | Performance-implied value in the top 18% of ATT peers | plays Striker; 2 yrs older; adj. G+A/90 0.49 vs 0.60 |